Skip to main content

Elizabeth Vale vs Goolwa

Property investment comparison - Elizabeth Vale, SA 5112 vs Goolwa, SA 5214

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Elizabeth Vale wins 3, Goolwa wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricElizabeth ValeGoolwa
Median house price$700K$710K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%-
1-year house growth+13.1%+11.7%estimate
3-year house growth+58.9%-
Vacancy rate0.5%1.3%
Population4,3312,558

Elizabeth Vale vs Goolwa: what the numbers say

The median house price is $700K in Elizabeth Vale and $710K in Goolwa, so Elizabeth Vale is the cheaper entry point, with Goolwa houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.1% in Elizabeth Vale and +11.7% in Goolwa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Elizabeth Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Elizabeth Vale and 1.3% in Goolwa, so landlords in Elizabeth Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Elizabeth Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,331 against 2,558, larger than Goolwa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Elizabeth Vale for a lower purchase price, Elizabeth Vale for recent price momentum, Elizabeth Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison