Skip to main content

Elizabeth Vale vs Moonta Bay

Property investment comparison - Elizabeth Vale, SA 5112 vs Moonta Bay, SA 5558

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Elizabeth Vale wins 3, Moonta Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricElizabeth ValeMoonta Bay
Median house price$700K$695K
Median unit price-$335K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%3.33%
1-year house growth+13.1%+14.8%
3-year house growth+58.9%+54.4%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.6%
Population4,3312,633

Elizabeth Vale vs Moonta Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $700K in Elizabeth Vale and $695K in Moonta Bay, so Moonta Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Elizabeth Vale houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.1% in Elizabeth Vale and +14.8% in Moonta Bay, so recent momentum favours Moonta Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Elizabeth Vale houses are +58.9% and Moonta Bay houses +54.4%, so Elizabeth Vale has compounded faster than Moonta Bay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Elizabeth Vale and 0.6% in Moonta Bay, so landlords in Elizabeth Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Elizabeth Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,331 against 2,633, larger than Moonta Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moonta Bay for a lower purchase price, Moonta Bay for recent price momentum, Elizabeth Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison