Elmore vs Tyntynder
Property investment comparison - Elmore, VIC 3558 vs Tyntynder, VIC 3586
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Elmore wins 2, Tyntynder wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Elmore | Tyntynder |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $485K | $485K |
| Median unit price | - | $445K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.37% | 5.48% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.16% | 5.16% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.6% |
| Population | 847 | 157 |
Elmore vs Tyntynder: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $485K in Elmore and $485K in Tyntynder.
On cash flow, Tyntynder leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.48%, compared with 5.37% in Elmore, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Elmore and 1.6% in Tyntynder, so landlords in Elmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Elmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 847 against 157, roughly 5 times the size of Tyntynder; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tyntynder for rental income, Elmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison