Skip to main content

Emerald Beach vs Maldon

Property investment comparison - Emerald Beach, NSW 2456 vs Maldon, NSW 2571

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emerald Beach wins 0, Maldon wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEmerald BeachMaldon
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$705K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%4.45%
Gross rental yield (units)-1.95%
1-year house growth-1.4%-
3-year house growth+14.5%-
Vacancy rate2.0%1.5%
Population2,67725

Emerald Beach vs Maldon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Emerald Beach and $1.0M in Maldon, so Maldon is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Emerald Beach sits at a median of $705K against $670K in Maldon, which makes Maldon the more affordable unit market and Emerald Beach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Maldon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.45%, compared with 3.50% in Emerald Beach, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Maldon and 2.0% in Emerald Beach, so landlords in Maldon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Emerald Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,677 against 25, roughly 107 times the size of Maldon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Maldon for rental income, Maldon for a lower purchase price, Maldon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison