Skip to main content

Emerald Beach vs Mowbray Park

Property investment comparison - Emerald Beach, NSW 2456 vs Mowbray Park, NSW 2571

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emerald Beach wins 1, Mowbray Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEmerald BeachMowbray Park
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$705K$675K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.18%
1-year house growth-1.4%-
3-year house growth+14.5%-
Vacancy rate2.0%2.5%
Population2,67794

Emerald Beach vs Mowbray Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Emerald Beach and $1.0M in Mowbray Park, so Mowbray Park is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Emerald Beach sits at a median of $705K against $675K in Mowbray Park, which makes Mowbray Park the more affordable unit market and Emerald Beach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mowbray Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.15%, compared with 3.50% in Emerald Beach, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Emerald Beach and 2.5% in Mowbray Park, so landlords in Emerald Beach face less competition for tenants.

Emerald Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,677 against 94, roughly 28 times the size of Mowbray Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mowbray Park for rental income, Mowbray Park for a lower purchase price, Emerald Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison