Emmaville vs Terry Hie Hie
Property investment comparison - Emmaville, NSW 2371 vs Terry Hie Hie, NSW 2400
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emmaville wins 1, Terry Hie Hie wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Emmaville | Terry Hie Hie |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $300K | $305K |
| Median unit price | $330K | $190K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 8.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 8.89% |
| 1-year house growth | +15.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 505 | 76 |
Emmaville vs Terry Hie Hie: what the numbers say
The median house price is $300K in Emmaville and $305K in Terry Hie Hie, so Emmaville is the cheaper entry point, with Terry Hie Hie houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Emmaville sits at a median of $330K against $190K in Terry Hie Hie, which makes Terry Hie Hie the more affordable unit market and Emmaville the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Terry Hie Hie and 1.8% in Emmaville, so landlords in Terry Hie Hie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Emmaville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 505 against 76, roughly 7 times the size of Terry Hie Hie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Emmaville for a lower purchase price, Terry Hie Hie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison