Skip to main content

Emu Heights vs Kotara South

Property investment comparison - Emu Heights, NSW 2750 vs Kotara South, NSW 2289

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emu Heights wins 1, Kotara South wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEmu HeightsKotara South
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.22%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)2.94%4.39%
1-year house growth+9.5%estimate+10.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.4%0.9%
Population3,2051,267

Emu Heights vs Kotara South: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Emu Heights and $1.2M in Kotara South.

On cash flow, Kotara South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.22% in Emu Heights, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Emu Heights (an estimate) and +10.7% in Kotara South (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kotara South, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Emu Heights and 0.9% in Kotara South, so landlords in Emu Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Emu Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,205 against 1,267, roughly 2.5 times the size of Kotara South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kotara South for rental income, Kotara South for recent price momentum, Emu Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison