Skip to main content

Emu Point vs North Lake

Property investment comparison - Emu Point, WA 6330 vs North Lake, WA 6163

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emu Point wins 3, North Lake wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEmu PointNorth Lake
Median house price$1.4M$1.3M
Median unit price$435K$635K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)6.58%5.39%
1-year house growth+21.1%+21.1%
3-year house growth+73.5%+57.2%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.3%
Population2851,299

Emu Point vs North Lake: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Emu Point and $1.3M in North Lake, so North Lake is the cheaper entry point, with Emu Point houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Emu Point sits at a median of $435K against $635K in North Lake, which makes Emu Point the more affordable unit market and North Lake the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.1% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Emu Point houses are +73.5% and North Lake houses +57.2%, so Emu Point has compounded faster than North Lake over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in North Lake and 0.4% in Emu Point, so landlords in North Lake face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Lake is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,299 against 285, roughly 4.6 times the size of Emu Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Lake for a lower purchase price, North Lake for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Emu Point vs North Lake: Suburb Comparison 2026