Skip to main content

Emu Point vs Woodvale

Property investment comparison - Emu Point, WA 6330 vs Woodvale, WA 6026

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emu Point wins 6, Woodvale wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEmu PointWoodvale
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$435K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.62%
Gross rental yield (units)6.58%3.74%
1-year house growth+21.1%+19.8%
3-year house growth+73.5%+72.1%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.8%
Population2859,579

Emu Point vs Woodvale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Emu Point and $1.4M in Woodvale, so Emu Point is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Emu Point sits at a median of $435K against $625K in Woodvale, which makes Emu Point the more affordable unit market and Woodvale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.1% in Emu Point and +19.8% in Woodvale, so recent momentum favours Emu Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Emu Point houses are +73.5% and Woodvale houses +72.1%, so Emu Point has compounded faster than Woodvale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Emu Point and 1.8% in Woodvale, so landlords in Emu Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woodvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,579 against 285, roughly 34 times the size of Emu Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Emu Point for a lower purchase price, Emu Point for recent price momentum, Emu Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison