Skip to main content

Engadine vs Kurmond

Property investment comparison - Engadine, NSW 2233 vs Kurmond, NSW 2757

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Engadine wins 4, Kurmond wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEngadineKurmond
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$940K$1.9M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%2.27%
Gross rental yield (units)4.35%-
1-year house growth+8.3%+7.5%estimate
3-year house growth+18.5%-
Vacancy rate1.3%7.0%
Population17,736850

Engadine vs Kurmond: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Engadine and $1.6M in Kurmond.

For units, Engadine sits at a median of $940K against $1.9M in Kurmond, which makes Engadine the more affordable unit market and Kurmond the pricier one.

On cash flow, Engadine leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.09%, compared with 2.27% in Kurmond, a gap of 0.82 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.3% in Engadine and +7.5% in Kurmond (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Engadine, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Engadine and 7.0% in Kurmond, so landlords in Engadine face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Engadine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,736 against 850, roughly 21 times the size of Kurmond; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Engadine for rental income, Engadine for recent price momentum, Engadine for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison