Skip to main content

Ethelton vs Roseworthy

Property investment comparison - Ethelton, SA 5015 vs Roseworthy, SA 5371

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ethelton wins 3, Roseworthy wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEtheltonRoseworthy
Median house price$880K$900K
Median unit price-$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.31%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%3.83%
1-year house growth+11.3%+12.1%
3-year house growth+10.1%+34.4%
Vacancy rate0.6%6.0%
Population1,4871,041

Ethelton vs Roseworthy: what the numbers say

The median house price is $880K in Ethelton and $900K in Roseworthy, so Ethelton is the cheaper entry point, with Roseworthy houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Roseworthy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.31% in Ethelton, a gap of 0.49 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Ethelton and +12.1% in Roseworthy, so recent momentum favours Roseworthy, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Ethelton houses are +10.1% and Roseworthy houses +34.4%, so Roseworthy has compounded faster than Ethelton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Ethelton and 6.0% in Roseworthy, so landlords in Ethelton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ethelton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,487 against 1,041, larger than Roseworthy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Roseworthy for rental income, Ethelton for a lower purchase price, Roseworthy for recent price momentum, Ethelton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison