Skip to main content

Ettalong Beach vs Woodpark

Property investment comparison - Ettalong Beach, NSW 2257 vs Woodpark, NSW 2164

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ettalong Beach wins 1, Woodpark wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEttalong BeachWoodpark
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$1.0M-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.60%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.25%
1-year house growth+6.6%+8.1%
3-year house growth+17.5%+23.9%
Vacancy rate1.4%2.5%
Population5,1611,706

Ettalong Beach vs Woodpark: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Ettalong Beach and $1.3M in Woodpark.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.6% in Ettalong Beach and +8.1% in Woodpark, so recent momentum favours Woodpark, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Ettalong Beach houses are +17.5% and Woodpark houses +23.9%, so Woodpark has compounded faster than Ettalong Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Ettalong Beach and 2.5% in Woodpark, so landlords in Ettalong Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ettalong Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,161 against 1,706, roughly 3.0 times the size of Woodpark; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodpark for recent price momentum, Ettalong Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison