Euston vs Ulong
Property investment comparison - Euston, NSW 2737 vs Ulong, NSW 2450
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Euston wins 1, Ulong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Euston | Ulong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $520K | $520K |
| Median unit price | - | $560K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.00% | 4.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.69% | 5.32% |
| 1-year house growth | -3.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Population | 822 | 215 |
Euston vs Ulong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $520K in Euston and $520K in Ulong.
On cash flow, Ulong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 3.00% in Euston, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Euston and 1.2% in Ulong, so landlords in Euston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Euston is the bigger suburb, with a population of 822 against 215, roughly 3.8 times the size of Ulong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ulong for rental income, Euston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison