Skip to main content

Eynesbury vs Toongabbie

Property investment comparison - Eynesbury, VIC 3338 vs Toongabbie, VIC 3856

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eynesbury wins 0, Toongabbie wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEynesburyToongabbie
Median house price$685K$685K
Median unit price$765K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.43%4.23%
Gross rental yield (units)3.16%3.68%
1-year house growth-7.8%+7.3%estimate
3-year house growth+2.3%-
Vacancy rate6.8%5.9%
Population2,8381,085

Eynesbury vs Toongabbie: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Eynesbury and $685K in Toongabbie.

For units, Eynesbury sits at a median of $765K against $560K in Toongabbie, which makes Toongabbie the more affordable unit market and Eynesbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Toongabbie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.23%, compared with 3.43% in Eynesbury, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -7.8% in Eynesbury and +7.3% in Toongabbie (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Toongabbie, while Eynesbury went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 5.9% in Toongabbie and 6.8% in Eynesbury, so landlords in Toongabbie face less competition for tenants.

Eynesbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,838 against 1,085, roughly 2.6 times the size of Toongabbie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Toongabbie for rental income, Toongabbie for recent price momentum, Toongabbie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison