Skip to main content

Fairfield Heights vs Gwynneville

Property investment comparison - Fairfield Heights, NSW 2165 vs Gwynneville, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield Heights wins 1, Gwynneville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairfield HeightsGwynneville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$870K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.50%
1-year house growth+6.0%estimate-1.5%
3-year house growth-+14.5%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.8%
Population8,2693,139

Fairfield Heights vs Gwynneville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Fairfield Heights and $1.3M in Gwynneville.

For units, Fairfield Heights sits at a median of $870K against $630K in Gwynneville, which makes Gwynneville the more affordable unit market and Fairfield Heights the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Fairfield Heights (an estimate) and -1.5% in Gwynneville, so recent momentum favours Fairfield Heights, while Gwynneville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gwynneville and 1.0% in Fairfield Heights, so landlords in Gwynneville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fairfield Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,269 against 3,139, roughly 2.6 times the size of Gwynneville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairfield Heights for recent price momentum, Gwynneville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Fairfield Heights vs Gwynneville: Suburb Comparison 2026