Skip to main content

Fairfield vs Keiraville

Property investment comparison - Fairfield, NSW 2165 vs Keiraville, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield wins 4, Keiraville wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairfieldKeiraville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$480K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.69%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.42%3.31%
1-year house growth+11.5%+3.9%estimate
3-year house growth+21.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population18,5964,001

Fairfield vs Keiraville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Fairfield and $1.3M in Keiraville.

For units, Fairfield sits at a median of $480K against $910K in Keiraville, which makes Fairfield the more affordable unit market and Keiraville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Fairfield and +3.9% in Keiraville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fairfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Fairfield and 1.6% in Keiraville, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fairfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,596 against 4,001, roughly 4.6 times the size of Keiraville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairfield for recent price momentum, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison