Skip to main content

Fairfield vs Mitchelton

Property investment comparison - Fairfield, QLD 4103 vs Mitchelton, QLD 4053

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield wins 2, Mitchelton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairfieldMitchelton
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$900K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.52%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.64%4.02%
1-year house growth+16.1%estimate+9.0%
3-year house growth-+36.5%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.3%
Population3,1069,244

Fairfield vs Mitchelton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Fairfield and $1.4M in Mitchelton.

For units, Fairfield sits at a median of $900K against $850K in Mitchelton, which makes Mitchelton the more affordable unit market and Fairfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.1% in Fairfield (an estimate) and +9.0% in Mitchelton, so recent momentum favours Fairfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Fairfield and 1.3% in Mitchelton, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mitchelton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,244 against 3,106, roughly 3.0 times the size of Fairfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairfield for recent price momentum, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison