Fairlight vs Lindfield
Property investment comparison - Fairlight, NSW 2094 vs Lindfield, NSW 2070
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairlight wins 3, Lindfield wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fairlight | Lindfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $4.1M | $4.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $1.3M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.35% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.45% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.3%estimate | +2.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Population | 6,141 | 10,943 |
Fairlight vs Lindfield: what the numbers say
The median house price is $4.1M in Fairlight and $4.2M in Lindfield, so Fairlight is the cheaper entry point, with Lindfield houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +2.3% in Fairlight (an estimate) and +2.1% in Lindfield (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fairlight, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Fairlight and 2.8% in Lindfield, so landlords in Fairlight face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lindfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,943 against 6,141, larger than Fairlight; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fairlight for a lower purchase price, Fairlight for recent price momentum, Fairlight for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison