Falcon vs Two Rocks
Property investment comparison - Falcon, WA 6210 vs Two Rocks, WA 6037
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Falcon wins 2, Two Rocks wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Falcon | Two Rocks |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | $800K |
| Median unit price | - | $930K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.06% | 2.51% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.6%estimate | +21.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 6.8% |
| Population | 5,531 | 3,822 |
Falcon vs Two Rocks: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Falcon and $800K in Two Rocks.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.6% in Falcon (an estimate) and +21.7% in Two Rocks (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Two Rocks, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Falcon and 6.8% in Two Rocks, so landlords in Falcon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Falcon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,531 against 3,822, larger than Two Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Two Rocks for recent price momentum, Falcon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison