Skip to main content

Fassifern Valley vs Riverhills

Property investment comparison - Fassifern Valley, QLD 4309 vs Riverhills, QLD 4074

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fassifern Valley wins 1, Riverhills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFassifern ValleyRiverhills
Median house price$1.1M$1.2M
Median unit price-$795K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.31%3.31%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.05%
1-year house growth--
3-year house growth-+51.2%
Vacancy rate2.2%0.9%
Population1124,121

Fassifern Valley vs Riverhills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Fassifern Valley and $1.2M in Riverhills, so Fassifern Valley is the cheaper entry point, with Riverhills houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.31% in Fassifern Valley and 3.31% in Riverhills, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Riverhills and 2.2% in Fassifern Valley, so landlords in Riverhills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Riverhills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,121 against 112, roughly 37 times the size of Fassifern Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fassifern Valley for a lower purchase price, Riverhills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison