Fawcett vs Lynbrook
Property investment comparison - Fawcett, VIC 3714 vs Lynbrook, VIC 3975
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fawcett wins 1, Lynbrook wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fawcett | Lynbrook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900K | $895K |
| Median unit price | - | $670K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.02% | 3.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.50% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +14.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| Population | 82 | 9,121 |
Fawcett vs Lynbrook: what the numbers say
The median house price is $900K in Fawcett and $895K in Lynbrook, so Lynbrook is the cheaper entry point, with Fawcett houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Lynbrook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 2.02% in Fawcett, a gap of 1.63 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fawcett and 1.7% in Lynbrook, so landlords in Fawcett face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lynbrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,121 against 82, roughly 111 times the size of Fawcett; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lynbrook for rental income, Lynbrook for a lower purchase price, Fawcett for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison