Skip to main content

Federal vs Wamberal

Property investment comparison - Federal, NSW 2480 vs Wamberal, NSW 2260

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Federal wins 4, Wamberal wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFederalWamberal
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$455K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.84%3.05%
1-year house growth+4.8%estimate+10.2%
3-year house growth-+7.7%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.6%
Population7846,991

Federal vs Wamberal: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.8M in Federal and $1.8M in Wamberal.

For units, Federal sits at a median of $455K against $1.3M in Wamberal, which makes Federal the more affordable unit market and Wamberal the pricier one.

On cash flow, Federal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.60% in Wamberal, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.8% in Federal (an estimate) and +10.2% in Wamberal, so recent momentum favours Wamberal, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Federal and 2.6% in Wamberal, so landlords in Federal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wamberal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,991 against 784, roughly 9 times the size of Federal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Federal for rental income, Wamberal for recent price momentum, Federal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison