Skip to main content

Felixstow vs Glenelg North

Property investment comparison - Felixstow, SA 5070 vs Glenelg North, SA 5045

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Felixstow wins 4, Glenelg North wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFelixstowGlenelg North
Median house price$1.3M$1.4M
Median unit price$755K$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.95%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%4.00%
1-year house growth+12.8%estimate+7.4%
3-year house growth-+31.4%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.9%
Population2,4776,594

Felixstow vs Glenelg North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Felixstow and $1.4M in Glenelg North, so Felixstow is the cheaper entry point, with Glenelg North houses about 3% dearer.

For units, Felixstow sits at a median of $755K against $710K in Glenelg North, which makes Glenelg North the more affordable unit market and Felixstow the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.8% in Felixstow (an estimate) and +7.4% in Glenelg North, so recent momentum favours Felixstow, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Felixstow and 0.9% in Glenelg North, so landlords in Felixstow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenelg North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,594 against 2,477, roughly 2.7 times the size of Felixstow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Felixstow for a lower purchase price, Felixstow for recent price momentum, Felixstow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison