Firle vs Glynde
Property investment comparison - Firle, SA 5070 vs Glynde, SA 5070
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Firle wins 1, Glynde wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Firle | Glynde |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $650K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.79% | 2.73% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.15% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +50.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| Population | 1,508 | 2,102 |
Firle vs Glynde: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Firle and $1.3M in Glynde, so Glynde is the cheaper entry point, with Firle houses about 4% dearer.
On cash flow, Firle leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.79%, compared with 2.73% in Glynde, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Glynde and 0.6% in Firle, so landlords in Glynde face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Glynde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,102 against 1,508, larger than Firle; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Firle for rental income, Glynde for a lower purchase price, Glynde for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison