Skip to main content

Fishing Point vs Wendoree Park

Property investment comparison - Fishing Point, NSW 2283 vs Wendoree Park, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fishing Point wins 2, Wendoree Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFishing PointWendoree Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$600K$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.27%
Gross rental yield (units)5.63%5.79%
1-year house growth+13.1%-
3-year house growth+20.0%-
Vacancy rate2.8%0.7%
Population1,105131

Fishing Point vs Wendoree Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Fishing Point and $1.2M in Wendoree Park.

For units, Fishing Point sits at a median of $600K against $610K in Wendoree Park, which makes Fishing Point the more affordable unit market and Wendoree Park the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fishing Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.39%, compared with 3.27% in Wendoree Park, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wendoree Park and 2.8% in Fishing Point, so landlords in Wendoree Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fishing Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,105 against 131, roughly 8 times the size of Wendoree Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fishing Point for rental income, Wendoree Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison