Skip to main content

Forestville vs Stanmore

Property investment comparison - Forestville, NSW 2087 vs Stanmore, NSW 2048

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Forestville wins 1, Stanmore wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricForestvilleStanmore
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.4M$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)3.07%3.50%
1-year house growth+8.0%+5.5%estimate
3-year house growth+5.4%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.2%
Population8,6597,619

Forestville vs Stanmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Forestville and $2.6M in Stanmore, so Stanmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Forestville sits at a median of $1.4M against $980K in Stanmore, which makes Stanmore the more affordable unit market and Forestville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Forestville and +5.5% in Stanmore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Forestville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Stanmore and 2.4% in Forestville, so landlords in Stanmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Forestville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,659 against 7,619, larger than Stanmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stanmore for a lower purchase price, Forestville for recent price momentum, Stanmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison