Framlingham vs Sale
Property investment comparison - Framlingham, VIC 3265 vs Sale, VIC 3850
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Framlingham wins 2, Sale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Framlingham | Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $570K | $570K |
| Median unit price | $340K | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.91% | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.61% | 6.19% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 169 | 14,296 |
Framlingham vs Sale: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $570K in Framlingham and $570K in Sale.
For units, Framlingham sits at a median of $340K against $350K in Sale, which makes Framlingham the more affordable unit market and Sale the pricier one.
On cash flow, Sale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 3.91% in Framlingham, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Framlingham and 1.7% in Sale, so landlords in Framlingham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Sale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,296 against 169, roughly 85 times the size of Framlingham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Sale for rental income, Framlingham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison