Skip to main content

Frankston North vs Yambuna

Property investment comparison - Frankston North, VIC 3200 vs Yambuna, VIC 3621

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Frankston North wins 1, Yambuna wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFrankston NorthYambuna
Median house price$715K$715K
Median unit price$605K$255K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.78%3.11%
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%5.00%
1-year house growth+13.3%-
3-year house growth+24.6%-
Vacancy rate0.9%0.3%
Population5,711109

Frankston North vs Yambuna: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $715K in Frankston North and $715K in Yambuna.

For units, Frankston North sits at a median of $605K against $255K in Yambuna, which makes Yambuna the more affordable unit market and Frankston North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Frankston North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.78%, compared with 3.11% in Yambuna, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Yambuna and 0.9% in Frankston North, so landlords in Yambuna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Frankston North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,711 against 109, roughly 52 times the size of Yambuna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Frankston North for rental income, Yambuna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison