Frederickton vs Keepit
Property investment comparison - Frederickton, NSW 2440 vs Keepit, NSW 2340
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Frederickton wins 1, Keepit wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Frederickton | Keepit |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $530K | $530K |
| Median unit price | - | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.87% | 5.57% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 6.49% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +6.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Population | 1,452 | 16 |
Frederickton vs Keepit: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $530K in Frederickton and $530K in Keepit.
On cash flow, Keepit leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.57%, compared with 4.87% in Frederickton, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Frederickton and 2.0% in Keepit, so landlords in Frederickton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Frederickton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,452 against 16, roughly 91 times the size of Keepit; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Keepit for rental income, Frederickton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison