Fulham vs Seabrook
Property investment comparison - Fulham, VIC 3851 vs Seabrook, VIC 3028
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fulham wins 0, Seabrook wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fulham | Seabrook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815K | $815K |
| Median unit price | $580K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 1.88% | 4.54% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 26.4% | 1.9% |
| Population | 994 | 4,952 |
Fulham vs Seabrook: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $815K in Fulham and $815K in Seabrook.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Seabrook and 26.4% in Fulham, so landlords in Seabrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seabrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,952 against 994, roughly 5.0 times the size of Fulham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seabrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison