Fulham vs Whittlesea
Property investment comparison - Fulham, VIC 3851 vs Whittlesea, VIC 3757
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fulham wins 1, Whittlesea wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fulham | Whittlesea |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815K | $820K |
| Median unit price | $580K | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.86% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 1.88% | 5.10% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 26.4% | 1.3% |
| Population | 994 | 6,117 |
Fulham vs Whittlesea: what the numbers say
The median house price is $815K in Fulham and $820K in Whittlesea, so Fulham is the cheaper entry point, with Whittlesea houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Fulham sits at a median of $580K against $455K in Whittlesea, which makes Whittlesea the more affordable unit market and Fulham the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Whittlesea and 26.4% in Fulham, so landlords in Whittlesea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Whittlesea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,117 against 994, roughly 6 times the size of Fulham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fulham for a lower purchase price, Whittlesea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison