Skip to main content

Gaven vs North Arm

Property investment comparison - Gaven, QLD 4211 vs North Arm, QLD 4561

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gaven wins 2, North Arm wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGavenNorth Arm
Median house price$1.6M$1.5M
Median unit price$895K$655K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.55%4.58%
1-year house growth+4.3%+9.9%
3-year house growth+32.0%+31.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.6%
Population1,638734

Gaven vs North Arm: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Gaven and $1.5M in North Arm, so North Arm is the cheaper entry point, with Gaven houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Gaven sits at a median of $895K against $655K in North Arm, which makes North Arm the more affordable unit market and Gaven the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Gaven and +9.9% in North Arm, so recent momentum favours North Arm, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gaven houses are +32.0% and North Arm houses +31.9%, so Gaven has compounded faster than North Arm over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Gaven and 1.6% in North Arm, so landlords in Gaven face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gaven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,638 against 734, roughly 2.2 times the size of North Arm; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Arm for a lower purchase price, North Arm for recent price momentum, Gaven for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison