Skip to main content

Georgetown vs Glendenning

Property investment comparison - Georgetown, NSW 2298 vs Glendenning, NSW 2761

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Georgetown wins 3, Glendenning wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGeorgetownGlendenning
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$710K$775K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%3.43%
1-year house growth+8.5%estimate+7.3%
3-year house growth-+26.5%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.7%
Population2,0725,196

Georgetown vs Glendenning: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Georgetown and $1.1M in Glendenning.

For units, Georgetown sits at a median of $710K against $775K in Glendenning, which makes Georgetown the more affordable unit market and Glendenning the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.5% in Georgetown (an estimate) and +7.3% in Glendenning, so recent momentum favours Georgetown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Glendenning and 0.8% in Georgetown, so landlords in Glendenning face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glendenning is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,196 against 2,072, roughly 2.5 times the size of Georgetown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Georgetown for recent price momentum, Glendenning for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison