Giffard vs Mount Clear
Property investment comparison - Giffard, VIC 3851 vs Mount Clear, VIC 3350
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Giffard wins 0, Mount Clear wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Giffard | Mount Clear |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $595K | $595K |
| Median unit price | - | $435K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.95% | 3.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.70% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 26.4% | 1.1% |
| Population | 73 | 3,671 |
Giffard vs Mount Clear: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $595K in Giffard and $595K in Mount Clear.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.95% in Giffard and 3.95% in Mount Clear, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Mount Clear and 26.4% in Giffard, so landlords in Mount Clear face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Clear is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,671 against 73, roughly 50 times the size of Giffard; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Clear for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison