Skip to main content

Gilgai vs Ulmarra

Property investment comparison - Gilgai, NSW 2360 vs Ulmarra, NSW 2462

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gilgai wins 3, Ulmarra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGilgaiUlmarra
Median house price$580K$590K
Median unit price$280K$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.46%
Gross rental yield (units)6.34%4.85%
1-year house growth-0.1%estimate+4.9%
3-year house growth-+10.0%
Vacancy rate2.3%0.8%
Population740749

Gilgai vs Ulmarra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $580K in Gilgai and $590K in Ulmarra, so Gilgai is the cheaper entry point, with Ulmarra houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Gilgai sits at a median of $280K against $415K in Ulmarra, which makes Gilgai the more affordable unit market and Ulmarra the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.1% in Gilgai (an estimate) and +4.9% in Ulmarra, so recent momentum favours Ulmarra, while Gilgai went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Ulmarra and 2.3% in Gilgai, so landlords in Ulmarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ulmarra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 749 against 740, larger than Gilgai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gilgai for a lower purchase price, Ulmarra for recent price momentum, Ulmarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison