Glebe vs Ryde
Property investment comparison - Glebe, NSW 2037 vs Ryde, NSW 2112
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glebe wins 1, Ryde wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glebe | Ryde |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.6M | $2.6M |
| Median unit price | $1M | $740K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.31% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.88% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | +1.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Population | 11,680 | 31,907 |
Glebe vs Ryde: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.6M in Glebe and $2.6M in Ryde.
For units, Glebe sits at a median of $1M against $740K in Ryde, which makes Ryde the more affordable unit market and Glebe the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Glebe (an estimate) and +1.2% in Ryde (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ryde, while Glebe went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Glebe and 1.5% in Ryde, so landlords in Glebe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ryde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,907 against 11,680, roughly 2.7 times the size of Glebe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ryde for recent price momentum, Glebe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison