Skip to main content

Gledswood Hills vs Greenfield Park

Property investment comparison - Gledswood Hills, NSW 2557 vs Greenfield Park, NSW 2176

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gledswood Hills wins 4, Greenfield Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGledswood HillsGreenfield Park
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$1.9M-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)1.98%4.15%
1-year house growth+11.2%estimate+10.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.2%2.3%
Population6,1125,394

Gledswood Hills vs Greenfield Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Gledswood Hills and $1.4M in Greenfield Park, so Gledswood Hills is the cheaper entry point, with Greenfield Park houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Gledswood Hills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.09%, compared with 2.52% in Greenfield Park, a gap of 0.57 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.2% in Gledswood Hills (an estimate) and +10.4% in Greenfield Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gledswood Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.2%.

Gledswood Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,112 against 5,394, larger than Greenfield Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gledswood Hills for rental income, Gledswood Hills for a lower purchase price, Gledswood Hills for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison