Glen Eden vs Oakey
Property investment comparison - Glen Eden, QLD 4680 vs Oakey, QLD 4401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glen Eden wins 0, Oakey wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glen Eden | Oakey |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $655K | $655K |
| Median unit price | $450K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +68.1% | +89.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.8% |
| Population | 2,918 | 4,756 |
Glen Eden vs Oakey: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $655K in Glen Eden and $655K in Oakey.
Looking back three years, Glen Eden houses are +68.1% and Oakey houses +89.3%, so Oakey has compounded faster than Glen Eden over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Oakey and 1.3% in Glen Eden, so landlords in Oakey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Oakey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,756 against 2,918, larger than Glen Eden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Oakey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison