Glen Innes vs Liston
Property investment comparison - Glen Innes, NSW 2370 vs Liston, NSW 2372
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glen Innes wins 2, Liston wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glen Innes | Liston |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $450K | $455K |
| Median unit price | - | $210K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.73% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.8% |
| Population | 6,219 | 130 |
Glen Innes vs Liston: what the numbers say
The median house price is $450K in Glen Innes and $455K in Liston, so Glen Innes is the cheaper entry point, with Liston houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Glen Innes and 1.8% in Liston, so landlords in Glen Innes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Glen Innes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,219 against 130, roughly 48 times the size of Liston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glen Innes for a lower purchase price, Glen Innes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison