Skip to main content

Glen Innes vs The Rock

Property investment comparison - Glen Innes, NSW 2370 vs The Rock, NSW 2655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glen Innes wins 4, The Rock wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlen InnesThe Rock
Median house price$450K$455K
Median unit price-$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.73%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+17.5%+9.6%
3-year house growth+32.2%+28.3%
Vacancy rate0.9%2.0%
Population6,2191,347

Glen Innes vs The Rock: what the numbers say

The median house price is $450K in Glen Innes and $455K in The Rock, so Glen Innes is the cheaper entry point, with The Rock houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.5% in Glen Innes and +9.6% in The Rock, so recent momentum favours Glen Innes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glen Innes houses are +32.2% and The Rock houses +28.3%, so Glen Innes has compounded faster than The Rock over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Glen Innes and 2.0% in The Rock, so landlords in Glen Innes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glen Innes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,219 against 1,347, roughly 4.6 times the size of The Rock; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glen Innes for a lower purchase price, Glen Innes for recent price momentum, Glen Innes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison