Glendale vs Largs
Property investment comparison - Glendale, NSW 2285 vs Largs, NSW 2320
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glendale wins 3, Largs wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glendale | Largs |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | $880K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.11% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.92% | 4.18% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.0% | +5.5% |
| 3-year house growth | +32.7% | +2.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.2% | 1.4% |
| Population | 3,260 | 1,962 |
Glendale vs Largs: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Glendale and $880K in Largs.
Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Glendale and +5.5% in Largs, so recent momentum favours Glendale, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Glendale houses are +32.7% and Largs houses +2.0%, so Glendale has compounded faster than Largs over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Glendale and 1.4% in Largs, so landlords in Glendale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Glendale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,260 against 1,962, larger than Largs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glendale for recent price momentum, Glendale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison