Skip to main content

Glendale vs Morisset

Property investment comparison - Glendale, NSW 2285 vs Morisset, NSW 2264

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glendale wins 4, Morisset wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlendaleMorisset
Median house price$880K$875K
Median unit price-$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.11%3.68%
Gross rental yield (units)2.92%4.97%
1-year house growth+12.0%+10.3%
3-year house growth+32.7%+18.2%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.5%
Population3,2604,078

Glendale vs Morisset: what the numbers say

The median house price is $880K in Glendale and $875K in Morisset, so Morisset is the cheaper entry point, with Glendale houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Glendale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.11%, compared with 3.68% in Morisset, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Glendale and +10.3% in Morisset, so recent momentum favours Glendale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glendale houses are +32.7% and Morisset houses +18.2%, so Glendale has compounded faster than Morisset over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Glendale and 0.5% in Morisset, so landlords in Glendale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Morisset is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,078 against 3,260, larger than Glendale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glendale for rental income, Morisset for a lower purchase price, Glendale for recent price momentum, Glendale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison