Skip to main content

Glendenning vs Googong

Property investment comparison - Glendenning, NSW 2761 vs Googong, NSW 2620

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glendenning wins 3, Googong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlendenningGoogong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$775K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)3.43%-
1-year house growth+7.3%+6.4%
3-year house growth+26.5%+7.6%
Vacancy rate0.7%3.1%
Population5,1967,444

Glendenning vs Googong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Glendenning and $1.1M in Googong.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.3% in Glendenning and +6.4% in Googong, so recent momentum favours Glendenning, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glendenning houses are +26.5% and Googong houses +7.6%, so Glendenning has compounded faster than Googong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Glendenning and 3.1% in Googong, so landlords in Glendenning face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Googong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,444 against 5,196, larger than Glendenning; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glendenning for recent price momentum, Glendenning for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison