Gleneagle vs Murray
Property investment comparison - Gleneagle, QLD 4285 vs Murray, QLD 4814
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gleneagle wins 1, Murray wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gleneagle | Murray |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $865K | $865K |
| Median unit price | $675K | $480K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 3.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.97% | 5.53% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +45.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Population | 2,106 | 1,739 |
Gleneagle vs Murray: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $865K in Gleneagle and $865K in Murray.
For units, Gleneagle sits at a median of $675K against $480K in Murray, which makes Murray the more affordable unit market and Gleneagle the pricier one.
On cash flow, Gleneagle leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.54% in Murray, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Murray and 2.4% in Gleneagle, so landlords in Murray face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Gleneagle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,106 against 1,739, larger than Murray; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gleneagle for rental income, Murray for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison