Skip to main content

Glenelg North vs Semaphore

Property investment comparison - Glenelg North, SA 5045 vs Semaphore, SA 5019

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenelg North wins 2, Semaphore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenelg NorthSemaphore
Median house price$1.4M$1.3M
Median unit price$710K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.95%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%3.82%
1-year house growth+7.4%+9.9%estimate
3-year house growth+31.4%-
Vacancy rate0.9%1.5%
Population6,5942,749

Glenelg North vs Semaphore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Glenelg North and $1.3M in Semaphore, so Semaphore is the cheaper entry point, with Glenelg North houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Glenelg North sits at a median of $710K against $700K in Semaphore, which makes Semaphore the more affordable unit market and Glenelg North the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.4% in Glenelg North and +9.9% in Semaphore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Semaphore, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Glenelg North and 1.5% in Semaphore, so landlords in Glenelg North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenelg North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,594 against 2,749, roughly 2.4 times the size of Semaphore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Semaphore for a lower purchase price, Semaphore for recent price momentum, Glenelg North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison