Skip to main content

Glenfield Park vs Long Point

Property investment comparison - Glenfield Park, NSW 2650 vs Long Point, NSW 2800

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenfield Park wins 2, Long Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenfield ParkLong Point
Median house price$685K$690K
Median unit price$475K$435K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.31%4.85%
Gross rental yield (units)4.55%5.93%
1-year house growth+13.7%-
3-year house growth+47.8%-
Vacancy rate2.0%3.6%
Population5,078237

Glenfield Park vs Long Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $685K in Glenfield Park and $690K in Long Point, so Glenfield Park is the cheaper entry point, with Long Point houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Glenfield Park sits at a median of $475K against $435K in Long Point, which makes Long Point the more affordable unit market and Glenfield Park the pricier one.

On cash flow, Long Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 4.31% in Glenfield Park, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Glenfield Park and 3.6% in Long Point, so landlords in Glenfield Park face less competition for tenants.

Glenfield Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,078 against 237, roughly 21 times the size of Long Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Long Point for rental income, Glenfield Park for a lower purchase price, Glenfield Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison