Skip to main content

Glengarry vs Thomson

Property investment comparison - Glengarry, VIC 3854 vs Thomson, VIC 3219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glengarry wins 1, Thomson wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlengarryThomson
Median house price$610K$610K
Median unit price$425K$520K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.01%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)3.86%4.25%
1-year house growth+3.6%estimate+12.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population1,1131,606

Glengarry vs Thomson: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $610K in Glengarry and $610K in Thomson.

For units, Glengarry sits at a median of $425K against $520K in Thomson, which makes Glengarry the more affordable unit market and Thomson the pricier one.

On cash flow, Thomson leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.01% in Glengarry, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.6% in Glengarry (an estimate) and +12.0% in Thomson (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Thomson, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Thomson and 1.6% in Glengarry, so landlords in Thomson face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Thomson is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,606 against 1,113, larger than Glengarry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thomson for rental income, Thomson for recent price momentum, Thomson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison