Skip to main content

Glenlee vs Karana Downs

Property investment comparison - Glenlee, QLD 4711 vs Karana Downs, QLD 4306

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenlee wins 3, Karana Downs wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenleeKarana Downs
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$415K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.92%3.54%
Gross rental yield (units)3.34%4.02%
1-year house growth+19.1%+7.4%
3-year house growth+61.1%+34.1%
Vacancy rate3.1%1.5%
Population1,1933,800

Glenlee vs Karana Downs: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Glenlee and $1.1M in Karana Downs.

On cash flow, Glenlee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.92%, compared with 3.54% in Karana Downs, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.1% in Glenlee and +7.4% in Karana Downs, so recent momentum favours Glenlee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glenlee houses are +61.1% and Karana Downs houses +34.1%, so Glenlee has compounded faster than Karana Downs over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Karana Downs and 3.1% in Glenlee, so landlords in Karana Downs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Karana Downs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,800 against 1,193, roughly 3.2 times the size of Glenlee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenlee for rental income, Glenlee for recent price momentum, Karana Downs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison