Skip to main content

Glenroy vs Hillvue

Property investment comparison - Glenroy, NSW 2640 vs Hillvue, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenroy wins 4, Hillvue wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenroyHillvue
Median house price$710K$715K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.03%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.70%
1-year house growth+12.7%+11.7%
3-year house growth+30.1%+28.8%
Vacancy rate1.4%2.6%
Population3,5286,528

Glenroy vs Hillvue: what the numbers say

The median house price is $710K in Glenroy and $715K in Hillvue, so Glenroy is the cheaper entry point, with Hillvue houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.00% in Glenroy and 4.03% in Hillvue, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Glenroy and +11.7% in Hillvue, so recent momentum favours Glenroy, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glenroy houses are +30.1% and Hillvue houses +28.8%, so Glenroy has compounded faster than Hillvue over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Glenroy and 2.6% in Hillvue, so landlords in Glenroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hillvue is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,528 against 3,528, larger than Glenroy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenroy for a lower purchase price, Glenroy for recent price momentum, Glenroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison