Skip to main content

Glenroy vs Woodberry

Property investment comparison - Glenroy, NSW 2640 vs Woodberry, NSW 2322

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenroy wins 1, Woodberry wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenroyWoodberry
Median house price$710K$710K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-7.24%
1-year house growth+12.7%+15.7%
3-year house growth+30.1%+37.3%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.9%
Population3,5283,024

Glenroy vs Woodberry: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $710K in Glenroy and $710K in Woodberry.

On cash flow, Woodberry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.00% in Glenroy, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Glenroy and +15.7% in Woodberry, so recent momentum favours Woodberry, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glenroy houses are +30.1% and Woodberry houses +37.3%, so Woodberry has compounded faster than Glenroy over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Glenroy and 1.9% in Woodberry, so landlords in Glenroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenroy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,528 against 3,024, larger than Woodberry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodberry for rental income, Woodberry for recent price momentum, Glenroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison